Jeffrey Schlupp
With our lack of pace currently and not looking like scoring , is it an idea to play Schlupp in an advanced role . I have never seen him play like this for us
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7Dr_R-j1A4 |
Schlupp left back, PVA left wing would be my preference
|
Quote:
|
Pace on both wings - yes please
if we went 4-5-1 (or a variation) then it means Sorloth up top as well and no Benteke. Worthy a try at least |
That video typifies how our players are lacking confidence. Schlupp, Benteke, Townsend, Punch (not just getting older IMO) and even Van Aanholt, all played much better previously. PVA starting to get his mojo back and Sako too before being criminally tackled by that scumbag Zabaletta.
Not sure what goes on in training but Roy needs to find a way to boost the players confidence going forward. |
Quote:
|
Schlupp is not good enough to make a difference to our attack but makes sense in a defensive set up. We need clean sheets so i would rather play him and PVA then both Sorlotth and CB..
|
Interesting video. Why is it players stop shooting like that when they sign for us!
|
Quote:
Yes that's why I raised this thread . We do not look like scoring at the moment , Schlupp was obviously playing in a different position for Leicester in these numerous clips , either behind striker or attacking midfielder . |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
We have no thrust from the middle without RLC and Benteke isn't scoring. Playing Schlupp as an AM is not a bad idea. Won't happen tho. He'll be on the flanks and it will be all about lumping it to Benteke.
|
RLC why the hell did we keep him at Christmas.....
|
Quote:
If you don’t play a Cf you don’t have an out ball |
We lack pace in an attacking sense. I agree, he should play for that reason alone.
|
Schlupp isn’t really that pacey
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.