CPFC BBS

CPFC BBS (https://www.cpfc.org/forums/index.php)
-   General Palace Discussion (https://www.cpfc.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=21)
-   -   Jeffrey Schlupp (https://www.cpfc.org/forums/showthread.php?t=274275)

exiledeagle 02-03-2018 08:50 PM

Jeffrey Schlupp
 
With our lack of pace currently and not looking like scoring , is it an idea to play Schlupp in an advanced role . I have never seen him play like this for us

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7Dr_R-j1A4

Palace Kebab 02-03-2018 09:37 PM

Schlupp left back, PVA left wing would be my preference

pauldrulez 02-03-2018 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Palace Kebab (Post 14140623)
Schlupp left back, PVA left wing would be my preference

Wouldn't move PVA. Playing his best football for us atm.

danpalace07 02-03-2018 10:20 PM

Pace on both wings - yes please

if we went 4-5-1 (or a variation) then it means Sorloth up top as well and no Benteke. Worthy a try at least

Glɑzier 02-03-2018 10:21 PM

That video typifies how our players are lacking confidence. Schlupp, Benteke, Townsend, Punch (not just getting older IMO) and even Van Aanholt, all played much better previously. PVA starting to get his mojo back and Sako too before being criminally tackled by that scumbag Zabaletta.

Not sure what goes on in training but Roy needs to find a way to boost the players confidence going forward.

rambo1 02-03-2018 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Palace Kebab (Post 14140623)
Schlupp left back, PVA left wing would be my preference

They can Interchange,when 1 Goes Forward,the other can Go Back.

bodger 02-03-2018 10:57 PM

Schlupp is not good enough to make a difference to our attack but makes sense in a defensive set up. We need clean sheets so i would rather play him and PVA then both Sorlotth and CB..

Essexeagle 02-03-2018 11:35 PM

Interesting video. Why is it players stop shooting like that when they sign for us!

exiledeagle 02-03-2018 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Essexeagle (Post 14140745)
Interesting video. Why is it players stop shooting like that when they sign for us!


Yes that's why I raised this thread . We do not look like scoring at the moment , Schlupp was obviously playing in a different position for Leicester in these numerous clips , either behind striker or attacking midfielder .

exiledeagle 03-03-2018 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by exiledeagle (Post 14140759)
Yes that's why I raised this thread . We do not look like scoring at the moment , Schlupp was obviously playing in a different position for Leicester in these numerous clips , either behind striker or attacking midfielder .

Also he scored 10 goals for Leicester and 6 at Brentford on loan , maybe full back is not his best position - just a thought

Essexeagle 03-03-2018 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by exiledeagle (Post 14140759)
Yes that's why I raised this thread . We do not look like scoring at the moment , Schlupp was obviously playing in a different position for Leicester in these numerous clips , either behind striker or attacking midfielder .

I think he started his career as a striker. But for us, even his efforts when he got into good shooting positions have been woeful...

SOUTHGATE EAGLE 03-03-2018 03:44 AM

We have no thrust from the middle without RLC and Benteke isn't scoring. Playing Schlupp as an AM is not a bad idea. Won't happen tho. He'll be on the flanks and it will be all about lumping it to Benteke.

in-exile 03-03-2018 05:10 AM

RLC why the hell did we keep him at Christmas.....

sylvan eagle 03-03-2018 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bodger (Post 14140702)
Schlupp is not good enough to make a difference to our attack but makes sense in a defensive set up. We need clean sheets so i would rather play him and PVA then both Sorlotth and CB..


If you don’t play a Cf you don’t have an out ball

glaziers fan 03-03-2018 08:29 PM

We lack pace in an attacking sense. I agree, he should play for that reason alone.

lee_cpfc 03-03-2018 08:31 PM

Schlupp isn’t really that pacey

Lombardo's hair 03-03-2018 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by in-exile (Post 14140842)
RLC why the hell did we keep him at Christmas.....

Because it was a season long loan and unless Chelsea agreed to take him back.....we were stuck with him. They obviously didntvwant him back

red&blue_moomin 05-03-2018 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by in-exile (Post 14140842)
RLC why the hell did we keep him at Christmas.....

The club clearly think he'll be back before the end of the season. He's also when combined with Wilf, Cabaye and Andros one of our actually useful attacking players. You take one or two of them out of the squad and we turn to rat shit from an attacking perspective as no one carries the ball and we are really really easy to stop because you only have to deal with one player.

Sick Bucket 05-03-2018 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by exiledeagle (Post 14140545)
With our lack of pace currently and not looking like scoring , is it an idea to play Schlupp in an advanced role . I have never seen him play like this for us

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7Dr_R-j1A4

Interesting!

carter 05-03-2018 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sick Bucket (Post 14145214)
Interesting!

I always thought he was originally signed to play left wing not as a left back. Certainly don’t think he’s a left back. The run he made against Hull last game of the season when he won the penalty goes to show that he’s a more attacking player


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.