View Single Post
  #114  
Old 31-08-2016, 02:30 PM
swissroll's Avatar
swissroll swissroll is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 9,133
Rep Power: 18133781
swissroll came here looking for the peace and quiet; the healthy air and the healthy dietswissroll came here looking for the peace and quiet; the healthy air and the healthy dietswissroll came here looking for the peace and quiet; the healthy air and the healthy dietswissroll came here looking for the peace and quiet; the healthy air and the healthy dietswissroll came here looking for the peace and quiet; the healthy air and the healthy dietswissroll came here looking for the peace and quiet; the healthy air and the healthy dietswissroll came here looking for the peace and quiet; the healthy air and the healthy dietswissroll came here looking for the peace and quiet; the healthy air and the healthy dietswissroll came here looking for the peace and quiet; the healthy air and the healthy dietswissroll came here looking for the peace and quiet; the healthy air and the healthy dietswissroll came here looking for the peace and quiet; the healthy air and the healthy diet
Quote:
Originally Posted by mik59 View Post
We seem to have gone off piste so let me try to bring this back on track. This is about:

a) the legalities of invoking Article 50 and the Courts will decide whether the Government has the power under royal prerogative to do this by itself or whether Parliament must do so because it passed the Act under which we joined and therefore it may be that only Parliament can start a process under which we leave i.e. end up repealing that Act; and
Would have thought Theresa would put this before Parliament anyway irrespective of the legal argument - why risk a load of aggro - and spreads the blame a bit. Of course if Parliament voted not to, well our Parliament has then exercised democratic control - everybody happy surely.....
Reply With Quote