How does one trouser £300million in 'the right way' ?

[Coastal Palace]

Originally Posted by C-Sider

May have been better that admin if you had?

The point was, when you needed investment you went to the yanks and we got ours from an actual fan of the club.

Unlike ya'll.

With regards administration, I'd contact the previous owners if it's bothering you that much because our present incumbents are doing a stand up, sterling job.

Innit blud.

[Coastal Palace]

All joking aside, you throw shit at us and we can throw a lot more back.

[EagleEater]

Originally Posted by Coastal Palace

All joking aside, you throw shit at us and we can throw a lot more back.

LOL! That has to be a joke right? The way Palace are run is laughable! You already wrote off debts twice within a 10 year period. Your "Fanatics" have ****ed off and were never fans in the first place. You shit in "away teams" changing rooms and vandalize your own coaches.

Could go on...

[grand aigle]

Originally Posted by EagleEater

LOL! That has to be a joke right? The way Palace are run is laughable! You already wrote off debts twice within a 10 year period. Your "Fanatics" have ****ed off and were never fans in the first place. You shit in "away teams" changing rooms and vandalize your own coaches.

Could go on...

Charlie Oatway was responsible for that as you well know!!! Anyway, its your shower that are 'shit in the away dressing room, and the home dressing room too!
Your shower of shit 'wrote off' debts too, you aint squeaky clean....
300 million pounds gift is doing it the right way?? I think not, if you criticise others for doing the same thing...
you could go on, why dont you just **** off, you're always saying how boring it is on here, yet you, c sucker and simplemat are always here?

[Away Day Eagle]

Originally Posted by C-Sider

There are no 'facts' other than TB making an investment to his much loved club

You are a shit witness - so The Penguin did not at all just slot you lot £300 Million (Three Hundred Million). A return is now required. Fair enough.

This announcement is certainly a surprise. Further it represents a substantial departure from you previous position on the matter.

So tell us how a club that lost £38 Million, that auditors described as a non-viable concern now intends to repay approximately 10 times that amount before interest, incidental cost and the Penguin's pay off are factored in.

Please consult EE on this this matter - should incisive, expert analysis be required.

I look forward to your definitive response.

[Phil's Barber]

Originally Posted by Garfy

So is he a modern day Mark Goldberg?

No. Goldberg is full sized.

[Spindle]

Originally Posted by Coastal Palace

You and your divvy mate should keep very quiet when mentioning the words 'cap in hand.'

I seem to remember throwing a few quid to your cap in hand when you were throwing the begging bowl around.

That's 20p I'll never see again.

That 20p bought Will Buckley !!!

[Spindle]

Originally Posted by C-Sider

May have been better that admin if you had?

The point was, when you needed investment you went to the yanks and we got ours from an actual fan of the club.

Unlike ya'll.

Let's dissect this

1. A trading company performs well and has a further share issue thus generating investment income, which is invested long term
2. A company that is has doubts about being a going concern calls upon a majority shareholder to loan the club increasing amounts of hard cash to remain afloat.

Which one is being run properly?

[Coastal Palace]

Originally Posted by Spindle

That 20p bought Will Buckley !!!

What did they do with the other 15p?

[dannyb1]

Originally Posted by Coastal Palace

What did they do with the other 15p?

Bought a curley wurley as backup.

[Away Day Eagle]

Originally Posted by Spindle

Let's dissect this

1. A trading company performs well and has a further share issue thus generating investment income, which is invested long term
2. A company that is has doubts about being a going concern calls upon a majority shareholder to loan the club increasing amounts of hard cash to remain afloat.

Which one is being run properly?

Spindle

Dear Chap - this is the land of make believe.

Facts have no relevance, meaning or gravitas.

This is an alternate reality, where Br*ghton, funded all their losses over a 20 year period, via a combination of both fresh air as well as spare shirt buttons, in humble support of their "noble" cause.

Both Harvard as well as Oxford University have ignored these voodoo economics, they claim that they do not have the expert knowledge. On the BBS, we EE and C-Sider.

In a attempt to disguise a £300 Million (Three Hundred Million) they decided that any discussion of this matter was not worth pursuing. In a North Korean Chat type directive, taking the lead from Spinal Tap and their attitude to the unexplained death of their drummers, this was best left unsolved.

Any opposing fan that mentioned it would simply be ignored.

However, they still manged to still overspend, but somehow managed to gain in the process a further 25,000 "fans" and worked their way up the Leagues.

Following several very expensive (as their audited accounts prove beyond doubt) and unsuccessful attempts to get promoted including home advantage in the final leg 2012, even "tinpot" opposition proved to be a bridge too far.

Sadly, it wasn't all gravy, though, this came at a further substantial price - these mercenaries made their own demands and many supported a top six side.

Further they encouraged their young folk to ask for the shirts of their favourite stars and insisted on leaving after 75 minutes. Once again, this was not worthy of discussion.

Rumours of the Withoutdean being sold out most weeks were "mistaken" and this rumour would appear to have about the same validity as a Sussex Police statement. Apparently.

The BBC did manage to squeeze them in this "Premier League Ready" club finally returned to it's rightful place of the "promised land" on Football Focus for a brief, few moments. Their academy graduates make most of their first team.

But all well that ends well, they ended up in the top flight of English Football, yet at no point did they require any access to any level of external funding whatsoever.

In summary, they don't run their club in such a way. They run it in the "right way".

And we all lived happily ever after.

[Penstone Eagle]

Originally Posted by Away Day Eagle

Spindle

Dear Chap - this is the land of make believe.

Facts have no relevance, meaning or gravitas.

This is an alternate reality, where Br*ghton, funded all their losses over a 20 year period, via a combination of both fresh air as well as spare shirt buttons, in humble support of their "noble" cause.

Both Harvard as well as Oxford University have ignored these voodoo economics, they claim that they do not have the expert knowledge. On the BBS, we EE and C-Sider.

In a attempt to disguise a £300 Million (Three Hundred Million) they decided that any discussion of this matter was not worth pursuing. In a North Korean Chat type directive, taking the lead from Spinal Tap and their attitude to the unexplained death of their drummers, this was best left unsolved.

Any opposing fan that mentioned it would simply be ignored.

However, they still manged to still overspend, but somehow managed to gain in the process a further 25,000 "fans" and worked their way up the Leagues.

Following several very expensive (as their audited accounts prove beyond doubt) and unsuccessful attempts to get promoted including home advantage in the final leg 2012, even "tinpot" opposition proved to be a bridge too far.

Sadly, it wasn't all gravy, though, this came at a further substantial price - these mercenaries made their own demands and many supported a top six side.

Further they encouraged their young folk to ask for the shirts of their favourite stars and insisted on leaving after 75 minutes. Once again, this was not worthy of discussion.

Rumours of the Withoutdean being sold out most weeks were "mistaken" and this rumour would appear to have about the same validity as a Sussex Police statement. Apparently.

The BBC did manage to squeeze them in this "Premier League Ready" club finally returned to it's rightful place of the "promised land" on Football Focus for a brief, few moments. Their academy graduates make most of their first team.

But all well that ends well, they ended up in the top flight of English Football, yet at no point did they require any access to any level of external funding whatsoever.

In summary, they don't run their club in such a way. They run it in the "right way".

And we all lived happily ever after.

Ah, fact over fiction.

Can't beat it or argue with it.

Stand by for more feeble and most likely abusive attempts to do so..