#1
|
||||
|
||||
Oh Tony Pulis, What have you done?
Isn't about time we started one of these too? I personally think he will eventually regret his decision to walk out
__________________
"The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you never know if they are genuine" - Abraham Lincoln |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I'd love to be in the relegation consultation business considering how much money is at stake in the PL every year. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
A worthy thread imo. I reckon the reason he was arguing with his missus is because he is so stubborn that he wouldn't even listen to her.
Sorry Tony but you ****ed up here, Palace have more potential than Stoke but you couldn't see it. I know SP can be hard to work with but he is a clever sod who knows his onions, you should've stayed and proved yourself. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I reckon he'll end up at the Pooper Hoopers and find his relegation record looking like Coventry City's: had a long spell but when it goes tits up, it really goes.
__________________
Crystal Ball Champion 2013/14; 2020/21. If you wish to follow a football club based on their success then you could not view yourself as a supporter ... you are merely a customer. - Mat ov CPFC. Don't let anybody make you think that God chose America as his divine messianic force to be a sort of policeman of the whole world. God has a way of standing before the nations with judgement and it seems to me that I can hear God saying to America, "You are too arrogant." - Martin Luther King |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Think he will end up at QPR too but he would keep them up.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
I actually don't think he will.
QPR are busy trying to tie Harry down to a new deal and seem determined to stick with him and not go back to the old sack the manager every three months route. Then again a few weeks in the relegation zone could change that
__________________
I'm Palace till I die! I'm Palace till I die! I know I am, I'm sure I am, I'm Palace till I die!!! |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
He will end up at Leicester I think
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Ill be honest
Imo we needed him more than he needed us! If we had kept him happy and bought in Siggy and Caulker we would be sitting in a much better position. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
We would obviously. Sigurdsson is a fine player. Any club taking TP on would need deep pockets as remember Stoke lost £30m in his last year, the third highest loss in the league. QPR with billionaire owners, including a 30% stake for the Mittal steel family would spend whatever it takes. Although a £60m loss didn't keep them up last time.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
It's a difficult one. Looking at the transfers we made, I think it is fairly obvious why Pulis went. All that guff about strain on his relationship is probably bollocks.
But is it wise to give a manager full power to spend whatever he wants, on whoever he wants? I'd say no. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Set him a budget and let him get on with it surely?
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
But as others have pointed out, due to his spending at Stoke they barely made any profit from being in Premier League. Like I say it's a difficult one but I can completely understand why Parish didn't want to pay a lot of money for players like Peter Crouch.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Pulis worked with his last chairman for 8 years? Has Parish had a manager for more than 18 months? Not criticising anyone by the way just seems like an odd thread and a more so a bitter thread. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Fwiw the reason we look to have not spent that much is that we are living within our means. 30m losses could kill us. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Unlike the billionaire Bet365 family that run Stoke I doubt our directors could sustain £30m annual losses. If we then got relegated we would be in Admin a 4th time.
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Oh Tony Pulis, What have you done?
Managed us to our highest ever league position in 22 years.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
I only know his last year but that would be great to know.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
And then walked out at the worst possible moment.
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Also, your implication that he walked over transfer budget actually makes him out to be a bit of a wanker. He knew and had agreed with the transfer budget, to walk out two days before the start of the season over it, as you are suggesting he did, makes him a two-faced **** in my book.
__________________
"Two nil! And Palace are in business now! There's the look of relief on that mans face, and the look of joy on theirs!" |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|