#81
|
|||
|
|||
Totally agree. It was a real shame.
|
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Just seen we've got the worst conversion rate in terms of taking our chances in the entire league. As if we didn't know but it's so obvious that we need a striker or two who can finish. Really hope the board can sort this.
|
#83
|
||||
|
||||
TBF yesterday Hart played very well, the rest of their team were a shower but we had nine shots on target and he pulled a few very good saves. Do that against a weed keeper and it won't stay at 2 - 0.
|
#84
|
||||
|
||||
Even though the build up play is really quite precocious Sign that Eze from QPR and convert him into a striker. A front 4 of Townsend, Meyer, Zaha and Eze is the stuff of dreams. Especially when VAR comes in next season. Sell all our minger ill fitting targetmen forwards.
__________________
Russia demonization. Akin to 1930's Germany. Who funds the anti russia propaganda site bellingcat? http://newsvideo.su/video/9455566 Pretty obvious really. |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
I think if playing for us defoe would have scored in the third minute from wilf's cross!
|
#86
|
|||
|
|||
Even Daniel would have fancied his chances.
|
#87
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#88
|
||||
|
||||
What surprised me was the "expected goals" value for us against Burnley was only 1.92!
To view the link you have to Register or Login So in fact, although we had loads of shots/ chances, not many of them, according to the statisticians were as clear cut as most of us thought. Obviously this number is effected by the goals that we did score, which I imagine had very low expected goals values. I think this is because a lot of our shots were either from difficult angles (Wilf's chances) or from outside the boy (Max's shots). |
#89
|
||||
|
||||
But, yes obviously we do need a proper striker!
|
#90
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
A front four of ZahaMeyerTownsendEze will really be ferocious?
__________________
Russia demonization. Akin to 1930's Germany. Who funds the anti russia propaganda site bellingcat? http://newsvideo.su/video/9455566 Pretty obvious really. |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
Better
|
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
It's the amount of tap ins we miss that's alarming.too. |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Max should really be given an assist for Jimmy McArthur's goal - he totally sold Hart.
|
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Sooner or later we will thump someone! Let’s hope it’s that happens on Tuesday
|
#96
|
|||
|
|||
Just think one game we will convert these chances emphatically.
Hopefully starting on Tues pleassssssseeeeeeee |
#97
|
||||
|
||||
Expected goals. A useless stat. 1.92
I “expected” around 6 but was more than happy with 2 COYP
__________________
FFS Murray! |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
I would suggest that most (maybe not all) of the saves were ones which, had they been at Hennessey, would have been described as routine and ones which he "should" be making. I agree that we made a number of saves far too easy and should have been out of sight long before we were.
|
#99
|
|||
|
|||
It’s not a perfect model. As I understand it, it doesn’t take into account the proximity of defenders. So if you take into account the effort Zaha skied in that 2 on 2, a lot of the time a shot in that situation will have more defenders back who might make a block.
|
#100
|
||||
|
||||
Not too much wrong with Loftus-Cheek's finishing.
__________________
Ayew. Out to Townsend. ... They couldn't, could they? Benteke in the middle. BENTEKE! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|