#321
|
||||
|
||||
Lines? Don’t Sky already use some sydtem whereby it is seen straight away? They show it on replays?
|
#322
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#323
|
||||
|
||||
Just to correct you, they looked at it and decided it wasn't a clear error.
|
#324
|
||||
|
||||
If it takes calipers to work it out then the striker should get the benefit of the doubt. Just kills the game spending ages solving what the naked eye can't.
__________________
"The best thing about the future is that it only comes one day at a time." |
#325
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The TV guys said it took them 8 minutes to decide it was offside, not just because it took a while to have a clear picture with a straight line, but also because they had to consider whether Mata’s knee is an ‘active’ part of the player whereas the hand/arm of the defender is deemed not relevant. If we have VAR it should be for major decisions and corrections. Maybe there needs to be a time limit...eg overrule within 2 minutes or we stick with the refs original decision. Personally I can accept that it’s sport and that not every decision will be 100% correct when it’s scrutinised later. In the past I’ve seen balls cross the line and not been given as goals, so I’m just content that big mistakes like that have stopped. |
#326
|
||||
|
||||
Surely technology exists now where they can put something in the ball and on the players/pitch that can make things like offside automated? This would free up the linos to become assistants with the more contentious decisions like contact in and around the box, where incidents can look completely different depending on the angle it is viewed at. Think this current trial has proved flawed and even harder for referees to get things right if anything.
__________________
Russia demonization. Akin to 1930's Germany. Who funds the anti russia propaganda site bellingcat? http://newsvideo.su/video/9455566 Pretty obvious really. |
#327
|
|||
|
|||
It's bollocks.
Ditch it. |
#328
|
||||
|
||||
Pretty much.
__________________
Russia demonization. Akin to 1930's Germany. Who funds the anti russia propaganda site bellingcat? http://newsvideo.su/video/9455566 Pretty obvious really. |
#329
|
|||
|
|||
They gave it a cursory glance, decided it wasn't a clear error immediately (which is fair enough) so didn't review it. That's my understanding anyway but who knows, the operation is far from transparent. My point is that in football terms saying that wasn't handball is more controversial than saying Mata was onside yet VAR was used for one and not the other. I understand the reasons but they don't make sense which is partly why I think VAR needs to be scrapped.
|
#330
|
|||
|
|||
Pleased there's issues hopefully they will bin it.
|
#331
|
||||
|
||||
Not that it bothers me too much as it happened to FC Köln but they had an injury time winner ruled out for offside yesterday. The weird part about it was... 1. The offside player was right in front of the linesman who didn't give it and 2. No Hannover players or coaches appealed for it. So why was it reviewed?
__________________
https://www.cpfc.org/forums/showthread.php?t=284042 - New NBA Thread starting 2021/22 Season |
#332
|
||||
|
||||
If the current trends for turning football into a TV-only sport continue, this is inevitable. If VAR is pushed to become a 'gold standard' system for 'elite sport' then I can see kick offs all at 3pm being a potential barrier to this, and a barrier that the TV companies and VAR providers will want to overcome.
VAR is a TV fad. It only 'works' where the game is on TV. |
#333
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
https://www.cpfc.org/forums/showthread.php?t=284042 - New NBA Thread starting 2021/22 Season |
#334
|
||||
|
||||
Last night was a nonsense and should never have happened. The one good thing about VAR is that it can be 99% clear on offsides and should be able to be decided very quickly. The minute they have to look and re look at it then the decision should just go with the one originally made by the ref.
I’ve always thought that until technology catches up and we can have some sort of instant GPS type system, then we should just have the fourth official in front of a screen as a second pair of ‘super eyes’ if you like for the ref. It would not be fool proof but will eliminate about 90% of mistakes made by the ref. The key being that the fourth official can quickly watch a replay and pass it on to the ref. If it isn’t clear on first watch then it’s inconclusive and you just get on with it. Like I said, it’s not perfect and there will still be mistakes made but at least it will keep the game flowing whilst eradicating the majority of things ref’s miss.
__________________
“Supporting Palace has a certain cult value – like pretending that some Peruvian rock band is the best in the world.” - John Peel |
#335
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks that explains it.
__________________
Also Michael Hughes a f*****g 87 year old journeyman showed Garcia, Pongolle, Potter, Kewell and Cisse how to play in a wide position, he took the p**s out of us tonight. (LFC fansite) Comment is free, but facts are sacred. (C.P. Scott) |
#336
|
|||
|
|||
Good idea Bubbs. It has the benefit of being able to be easily implemented at most if not all professional games too.
|
#337
|
||||
|
||||
What, you mean two school crossing lollipops and a piece of string?
__________________
Half a Talent for an old ex-leper? |
#338
|
||||
|
||||
Hopefully this won't last
|
#339
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Although it would be useful to have the transparency, I'm not sure hearing the VAR say to the ref it's ok, whilst the game is going on, would enhance things. When the game stops for a VAR intervention however, I do think there should be more for the viewer and crowd to hear. Quote:
VAR is far from perfect because the PR surrounding it is laughable but each decision where you have actually seen it being used, rather than just thinking it hasn't been used, have all ended with the correct outcome on the pitch. And that can only be a good thing. The next thing it will get rid of is disgraceful Niasse and Dele Alli diving. |
#340
|
||||
|
||||
Watching Bayer Leverkusen vs Schalke.
What is the ******* point of VAR?! Seriously what a ******* joke. The referee watched a clear bit of footage of a player winning a great tackle and still gives a ******* penalty. Not for me. Even if they watch a replay and can't get it right we might as well all give up. Joke!!!
__________________
https://www.cpfc.org/forums/showthread.php?t=284042 - New NBA Thread starting 2021/22 Season |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|