CPFC BBS

CPFC BBS (https://www.cpfc.org/forums/index.php)
-   The Politics Forum (https://www.cpfc.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=58)
-   -   Tory Party (https://www.cpfc.org/forums/showthread.php?t=279419)

Baffled Bob 2 30-09-2019 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SKATE (Post 14931320)
I thought the banner was referring to levelling the economic playing field. I guess it's all about interpretation.

Yes. And your interpretation is wrong. And I suspect potential Labour voters will share my interpretation.

But that is the aim of the producers of the banner anyway. They want Labour to be a narrow revolutionary sect.

Edit : Just seen your edit! Apologies.

SKATE 30-09-2019 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baffled Bob 2 (Post 14931326)
Yes. And your interpretation is wrong. And I suspect potential Labour voters will share my interpretation.

But that is the aim of the producers of the banner anyway. They want Labour to be a narrow revolutionary sect.

See edited post. I didn't see the effigies.

SKATE 30-09-2019 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baffled Bob 2 (Post 14931326)
Yes. And your interpretation is wrong. And I suspect potential Labour voters will share my interpretation.

But that is the aim of the producers of the banner anyway. They want Labour to be a narrow revolutionary sect.

Edit : Just seen your edit! Apologies.

An editing frenzy. Apologies all round!

biggus mickus 30-09-2019 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bubbs11 (Post 14930199)
The Tory conference has just got underway

https://s0.gifyu.com/images/BFA6C0B7...B8C6855A75.gif

True.

adrenalin john 30-09-2019 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baffled Bob 2 (Post 14931317)
Can you really not see the problem? Will it really make potential Labour voters think:

"Yes. I want to throw my lot in with these people. They're definitely on the same page as me"

We say it's time to dial down on the nasty rhetoric and you give it this support.

A kinder, gentler politics?

I am an anarchist at heart but we can only move in the direction of freedom, cooperation and tolerance through progression not revolution.

adrenalin john 30-09-2019 10:20 AM

Although there of course comes a time that if evil and autocracy is forced through it has to be opposed by force.

To date the government has just about been held in check by rebel tories, parts of the media, the SNP, Gina Miller, the courts, parliament and the speaker.

Note how ineffective Labour have been

Baffled Bob 2 30-09-2019 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adrenalin john (Post 14931348)
Although there of course comes a time that if evil and autocracy is forced through it has to be opposed by force.

Not while we've got the right to vote.

Oisin 30-09-2019 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maz (Post 14931239)
I would love to think you are right. But polls (fwiw) aren't supporting that view at present.

In the last YouGov poll 20% of self-proclaimed Tories think he should resign. Quite high for six weeks in the job!

Anecdotally MPs who faced trouble in their constituencies say there's been membership churn with more Brexity voters joining or returning and more moderate members leaving

GreatGonzo 30-09-2019 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oisin (Post 14931385)
In the last YouGov poll 20% of self-proclaimed Tories think he should resign. Quite high for six weeks in the job!

Anecdotally MPs who faced trouble in their constituencies say there's been membership churn with more Brexity voters joining or returning and more moderate members leaving

May well all be based on the court decision last week?

meee 30-09-2019 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baffled Bob 2 (Post 14931317)
Can you really not see the problem? Will it really make potential Labour voters think:

"Yes. I want to throw my lot in with these people. They're definitely on the same page as me"

We say it's time to dial down on the nasty rhetoric and you give it this support.

I'm not defending the banner, I'm pointing out that the MPs complaining about it voted for the austerity that caused those deaths. Which would you suggest is more serious?

meee 30-09-2019 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SA Eagle (Post 14931290)
The problem is that the hanging effigies make the words seem far more sinister

I don't condone what the banner says. I also don't remember this level of coverage when Tory policies killed 130,000 people.

Baffled Bob 2 30-09-2019 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by meee (Post 14931432)
I'm not defending the banner, I'm pointing out that the MPs complaining about it voted for the austerity that caused those deaths. Which would you suggest is more serious?

You were defending the banner. Reread your post. And I also think the 130,000 figure has been widely discredited. It's fake news.

meee 30-09-2019 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baffled Bob 2 (Post 14931438)
You were defending the banner. Reread your post.

Apologies if it comes across that way. The rhetorical question was to point out the hypocrisy of the MP who took the picture rather than a defence of the language used in the banner.

meee 30-09-2019 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baffled Bob 2 (Post 14931438)
And I also think the 130,000 figure has been widely discredited. It's fake news.

Discredited in the sense it might not be that high. But surely 1 death is too many?

Baffled Bob 2 30-09-2019 11:40 AM

What's wrong with just saying that austerity has utterly failed and you should vote for a party that is going to do something about it?

Threatening violence against those that launched this policy is totally counterproductive.

meee 30-09-2019 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baffled Bob 2 (Post 14931450)
What's wrong with just saying that austerity has utterly failed and you should vote for a party that is going to do something about it?

Threatening violence against those that launched this policy is totally counterproductive.

I agree

Baffled Bob 2 30-09-2019 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by meee (Post 14931449)
Discredited in the sense it might not be that high. But surely 1 death is too many?

Of course it isn't. Governments make choices that affect mortality all the time. When Labour opposed pit closures in the 80s they were effectively advocating the deaths of people from COPD. And I supported it.

meee 30-09-2019 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baffled Bob 2 (Post 14931454)
Of course it isn't. Governments make choices that affect mortality all the time. When Labour opposed pit closures in the 80s they were effectively advocating the deaths of people from COPD. And I supported it.

I'm not entirely sure that's the same thing? You'd also support better working standards in order to greatly reduce risks. What policies have the government implemented in the last 9 years to significantly reduce the deaths caused by austerity?

GreatGonzo 30-09-2019 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by meee (Post 14931432)
I'm not defending the banner, I'm pointing out that the MPs complaining about it voted for the austerity that caused those deaths. Which would you suggest is more serious?

Which party wasn't going to undertake austerity?

meee 30-09-2019 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GreatGonzo (Post 14931462)
Which party wasn't going to undertake austerity?

They all did in 2010. I'm sure that makes it right.


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.