CPFC BBS

CPFC BBS (https://www.cpfc.org/forums/index.php)
-   General Palace Discussion (https://www.cpfc.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=21)
-   -   Jairo Riedewald (https://www.cpfc.org/forums/showthread.php?t=271278)

MFBias 29-08-2017 12:05 AM

I would rather try to recoup the money on Van Aanholt and keep Rieldwald/Schlupp for left back.

There is something attitude wise I dont like about Van Aanholt, he looks like he is very arrogant, add to that he hasnt played that great for us and I prefere Schlupp.

Kai 29-08-2017 04:58 AM

Don't judge the guy on one game. He was probably nervous as he'll and found himself out of his depth. Give him some time

ianace 29-08-2017 07:12 AM

A Dutch friend of mine asked why we signed him at the time?
He said that He wasn't nearly the best defender in Holland & was slow.
He also added that Ajax couldn't believe how much money we were prepared to pay for him!

Stuart Austen 29-08-2017 07:33 AM

I was just on holiday in Holland. I was watching a football magazine show with my wife's uncle and they were discussing why FDB signed Riedewald. It translated that none of the panel could understand why FDB would go for the player when there were much better options in the Erevidise

Riley 29-08-2017 07:39 AM

Where did you get £13m from?

BBK 29-08-2017 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riley (Post 13809598)
Where did you get £13m from?

Yeah it was under 8m.

Hector 29-08-2017 08:08 AM

Will we ever see him play again? If De Boer goes then I don't see it....miles off being ready.

Eagle Kneevil 29-08-2017 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaspercpfc (Post 13807833)
he'll turn out to be 2017's equivalent of Valérien Ismaël and then surprise us all by end up playing for Bayern Munich.

Or 2017's Zeki Fryers.

henryhallandhisbasque 29-08-2017 08:14 AM

£8m is a lot of money. You get in the mindset that these massive transactions are just Monopoly money, but somebody, somewhere is paying for them with the real stuff. If de Boer does leave early, chances are his replacement won't want this player. Then what? Back to Holland on the cheap for half of what was paid at best? Who makes up the several millions lost? How much longer can a club like ours keep making potential big mistakes like this and losing millions because of it? There must be some payback point eventually - one that will be very hard for a club like Palace to recover from.

aj4england 29-08-2017 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MFBias (Post 13809413)
I would rather try to recoup the money on Van Aanholt and keep Rieldwald/Schlupp for left back.

There is something attitude wise I dont like about Van Aanholt, he looks like he is very arrogant, add to that he hasnt played that great for us and I prefere Schlupp.

Decent shout

Thefunkymonk 29-08-2017 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gyro1780 (Post 13807947)
He's only played one game & you all want rid already :jerkit: :clown:

This. He's a good player

NickinOx 29-08-2017 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MFBias (Post 13809413)
I would rather try to recoup the money on Van Aanholt and keep Rieldwald/Schlupp for left back.

There is something attitude wise I dont like about Van Aanholt, he looks like he is very arrogant, add to that he hasnt played that great for us and I prefere Schlupp.

Yes.

Jon_C-Pal 29-08-2017 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MFBias (Post 13809413)
I would rather try to recoup the money on Van Aanholt and keep Rieldwald/Schlupp for left back.

There is something attitude wise I dont like about Van Aanholt, he looks like he is very arrogant, add to that he hasnt played that great for us and I prefere Schlupp.

Plus the fact Soure is nearing fitness, who may not be the best defensively I think he's better than PVA.

Codman Haddock 29-08-2017 12:05 PM

Van Aanholt is simply shocking defensively. Schlupp provides a far more solid option and with Souare in frame too, we have enough there. Money received could be reinvested elsewhere....if we can find someone who would take him..

Mr Palace 29-08-2017 12:22 PM

I'd happily sell PvA and keep souare and Schlupp, with Riedewald also an option there. The trouble is - no one will probably pay what we did for PvA.

Martin H 29-08-2017 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thefunkymonk (Post 13810176)
This. He's a good player

This

AJ 29-08-2017 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Codman Haddock (Post 13810223)
Van Aanholt is simply shocking defensively. Schlupp provides a far more solid option and with Souare in frame too, we have enough there. Money received could be reinvested elsewhere....if we can find someone who would take him..

I have to agree. He maybe better in a flat back 4, yet BFS preferred Shlupp in that position last season, which says a lot.

Sceagle 29-08-2017 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MFBias (Post 13809413)
I would rather try to recoup the money on Van Aanholt and keep Rieldwald/Schlupp for left back.

There is something attitude wise I dont like about Van Aanholt, he looks like he is very arrogant, add to that he hasnt played that great for us and I prefere Schlupp.

Why would we sell a left back? If one gets injured...

Sceagle 29-08-2017 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon_C-Pal (Post 13810186)
Plus the fact Soure is nearing fitness, who may not be the best defensively I think he's better than PVA.

Souare won't be match fit for a long long time

Mad Raschic Ken 29-08-2017 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sceagle (Post 13810342)
Souare won't be match fit for a long long time

He's playing for the U23s today, so maybe not too far away.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.