We all know how it ends

Quite happy with this. Anyone that invests in a football club either has A) money to burn B) a love for the game or c) completely mental. Fits all the criteria.

Yeah, new shares created at the current value; if the current directors consider that the value of the club has risen by 25% over the last 4 years for example, then they divide that by four (including Mr Textor) and offer a share/shares at around that rated value.

It would appear that the value of our club is rising so there is more revenue or potential revenue available for a new investors.

It's a bit of a complex answer to be honest and takes into account, assets, potential future earnings, as well as agreed investment in infrastrucutre shared across the board.

Throw it into a pot, and you come up with a magic number. which clearly Mr T is on board with.

Hoping that the gamesmanship (i.e. he's helped us buy these players rather than the fact that there may be more revenue for players) works well if this is the case and if there is additional revenue for players, playing our hand well will continue to provide value as the window approaches it's conclusion.

To put them in the shop window of a more highly-regarded league. Apparently.

Blitz, Textor and Parish...

Yeah, one or t'other would work :)

*cough*

Hah. They are looking to improve the value of their investment with their current/future plans. They ain't here for a quick buck, it ain't going to happen. SP is too savvy and has played a blinder from an outsiders far distant POV. The club is shaping up nicely for the future IMO.

Money has been invested at different stages of the clubs growth, so it doesn't really work like that. Money invested in 2010 (minimal) grew in value as we have grown in stature (!?), so a shareholding of a given value is at a multiple of what it would have been then.

Finance stuff.

If he is adding investment as has been reported, then why should his stake-holding be diminishing necessarily?

degenerate.

Indeed, it would be balanced if this was the case and it may well be so.

We'll find out when it's reported at CH.

Its a shame we don't have the 50+1 setup from the Bundesliga. Always thought the Supporters Trust missed a trick by not acquiring a permanent stake in the club.

Oh, he's not. As far as CPFC goes, his stake-holding has increased ten-fold if not more, as envisaged on paper.

Why do people on here take the piss on people's spelling etc.. We're all different and not all super educated but we support and love our club. Find it very annoying back to the point in question this seems a really good move he comes across really well. After watching tonight moreno from villa Real would be great very intelligent player.. But that funny lot are having kittens with all that's happening at the palace.

Yeah, I was a bit TL;DR, especially with the continued malapropism, which put me right off.

it's not about misspelling, it's about using of the wrong word.

malaprop
[ˈmaləˌpräp]
NOUN
malapropism (noun)
the mistaken use of a word in place of a similar-sounding one, often with unintentionally amusing effect, as in, for example, “dance a flamingo” (instead of flamenco).

Very hard to get an exact picture of our ownership structure, not enough info at CH!

$450m isn't enough for a 10% share in Palace We Want MOAAAAR!

Agreed I think in should be mandatory for all across 4 divisions to have at least 25% fan ownership. Would help stop breakaways and future dodgy investment.

Indeed; and when the HoldCo is in Delaware, it's a lot more tricky!