#21
|
|||
|
|||
I'm sure the ref must have seen that. Without VAR he'd give it. Just waits for confirmation from his mates in case he had given it and it turns out wrong.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Use it sparingly and it is a big plus. Some of the FA cup games though it felt like the VAR people were taking the piss over hairline decisions.
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Great idea. Let's also do away with linesmen, who are frequently unavailable in amateur leagues. And while we're at it, no more neutral refs because at some levels of the game, coaches have to ref a half each. It will save costs and keep the game as played by Messi exactly the same as the game played by me.
__________________
Crystal Ball Champion 2013/14; 2020/21. If you wish to follow a football club based on their success then you could not view yourself as a supporter ... you are merely a customer. - Mat ov CPFC. Don't let anybody make you think that God chose America as his divine messianic force to be a sort of policeman of the whole world. God has a way of standing before the nations with judgement and it seems to me that I can hear God saying to America, "You are too arrogant." - Martin Luther King |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
I agree with technology-but not in it's current format.
It should only be used when it's a clear an obvious major mistake. Also, the VAR referees should inform the on field referee as to what decision to implement. Instead we have this farce where the on field official runs off the pitch and takes up time. This isn't needed as it's already been viewed via the technology. Also, the people in the crowd stand around having no idea what's going on. That can't be right. The other issue I have is that VAR kills celebrations as you have to wait for goals to be reviewed. Celebration is one of the best things about football when it is spontaneous and genuine. |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Crystal Ball Champion 2013/14; 2020/21. If you wish to follow a football club based on their success then you could not view yourself as a supporter ... you are merely a customer. - Mat ov CPFC. Don't let anybody make you think that God chose America as his divine messianic force to be a sort of policeman of the whole world. God has a way of standing before the nations with judgement and it seems to me that I can hear God saying to America, "You are too arrogant." - Martin Luther King |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
It would have ruined our amazing celebrations of that moment! |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
I wouldn't have awarded that pen for France myself. The Aussies made a good tackle and his follow through took Griezman out. In the old days that was called taking everything out. I can't see how it can give a pen for that myself. Can sort of understand the lino only giving obvious offsides at the time though. They do need to make the crowd more aware in real time too. Clearly it's got its pros and cons.
__________________
Russia demonization. Akin to 1930's Germany. Who funds the anti russia propaganda site bellingcat? http://newsvideo.su/video/9455566 Pretty obvious really. |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Was a penalty in my view. Risdon didn't get any of the ball and his foot on his outstretched leg tripped him up. If the same thing happened down the other end I would have been pissed off it wasn't awarded.
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
For me, the foul secondary - although only a second or so after the tackle - and Greizmann has already lost control of the ball. If Greizmann still has the ball, or can get to the ball, then it's a foul and a pen, obviously. Just don't think he was and the ref was calling soft fouls all night when some were blatant dives (not that this was a dive).
__________________
Returned! |
#31
|
||||
|
||||
That fact people are still debating the French penalty means VAR should not have awarded a penalty. VAR should just intervene on 100%, no argument incidents that the ref has either not seen or is unsure of because of his angle.
__________________
“Supporting Palace has a certain cult value – like pretending that some Peruvian rock band is the best in the world.” - John Peel |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
My unhumble opinion is the touch on the ball made it legit. But the key issue is the element of doubt itself - having not given a pen, it wasn't clear enough to reverse that decision. |
#33
|
||||
|
||||
The problem for me is if the ref hasn't seen it then how does he know to review it, other than a load of players running up to him? A couple of times yesterday the ref got it completely wrong and didn't use the system.
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
The ref in the Peru game was poor. Missed the clear penalty which was rectified through VAR and then missed the penalty illegal and should have ended up in a free kick for Denmark - however he missed it.
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Definitely worth using the technology to look at all the angles for one like that but still not a pen if the laws of the game are applied correctly. Its never going to be perfect though is it.
__________________
Russia demonization. Akin to 1930's Germany. Who funds the anti russia propaganda site bellingcat? http://newsvideo.su/video/9455566 Pretty obvious really. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
For the Peru pen why did the ref play on it was a dive or a pen. The Argentina one was never a pen then one that was a pen was not looked at, the ref must stop the game as again it was a dive or a pen. Was the French one a clear pen? not for me, Russia had an offside goal given. VAR should only be used for clear errors like the Peru pen the rest should be refs call.
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
No it isn’t. The ref chooses whether to take the advice of the Lino and makes the decision himself.
__________________
As you type you don't realise that you are crying until you feel and see the tears on your hands. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Yes agree. Not a glaring obvious error......but it did favour France and Aussies are non league in international pecking order. If the incident needs more than a few seconds to review then they should just go with refs decisions. Because if it is not clear the then it's not an obvious error. End of. Oh and Spain's first goal should have been disallowed. Costa clearly strikes defender. Irrelevant whether as pundits say he should have been stronger. It was a foul....but Spain are the Man U of international football at moment
Last edited by Lombardo's hair; 17-06-2018 at 04:23 PM. |
#39
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Joking aside, I agree with your points and it's annoying. It kills the emotions in football as it does in Rugby. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
On VAR, does anyone know if they check the penalty for the keeper moving / encroachment etc on VAR?
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|